Foxwarrior: 3 revisions imported

2015-12-19T18:14:34Z

3 revisions imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:14, 19 December 2015
(No difference)

Foxwarrior: Redirected page to Decent approximations and other time savers#Charts

2014-04-18T08:04:41Z

Redirected page to Decent approximations and other time savers#Charts

Show changes

Foxwarrior: It's not quite as smooth a pattern, but at least you don't need to actually consult a chart to resolve it :)

2014-03-02T22:47:41Z

It's not quite as smooth a pattern, but at least you don't need to actually consult a chart to resolve it :)

New page

'''Shooting through Objects'''

'''For checking if your character can reasonably be expected to hit an enemy on the other side of something'''

Calculate the most damage your character could be expected to deal. If you have 2-4 attacks, use the damage for a single crit. If your character has more, or is using sniper a double crit becomes more reasonable. Once you have the most damage, compare the amount of damage required to destroy the object (HP * Toughness) with the Effective Material Damage in the chart below. If the EMD is higher by even a small amount, then it is likely that your character can severely wound if not kill the target.

'''For checking the results of an attack'''

Find the EMD for your attack and subtract the effective damage required for the object (HP * Toughness). Then, take the subtracted result and find which EMD values of the matching category that the subtracted result lies between. The lower EMD value indicates the amount of real damage dealt to the target.

{| class="d20"
|+ <div>{{Anchor|Effective Material Damage}}</div>
|-
! rowspan="1" | Real damage
! rowspan="1" | Normal
! rowspan="1" | Piercing
|-
| 1 || 1 || 4
|-
| 2 || 2 || 8
|-
| 3 || 3 || 12
|-
| 4 || 4 || 16
|-
| 5 || 5 || 20
|-
| 6 || 6 || 24
|-
| 7 || 7 || 28
|-
| 8 || 16 || 64
|-
| 9 || 18 || 72
|-
| 10 || 20 || 80
|-
| 11 || 22 || 88
|-
| 12 || 24 || 96
|-
| 13 || 26 || 104
|-
| 14 || 28 || 112
|-
| 15 || 30 || 120
|-
| 16 || 64 || 256
|-
| 17 || 68 || 272
|-
| 18 || 72 || 288
|-
| 19 || 76 || 304
|-
| 20 || 80 || 320
|-
| 21 || 84 || 336
|-
| 22 || 88 || 352
|-
| 23 || 92 || 368
|-
| 24 || 192 || 768
|-
| 25 || 200 || 800
|-
| 26 || 208 || 832
|-
| 27 || 216 || 864
|-
| 28 || 224 || 896
|-
| 29 || 232 || 928
|-
| 30 || 240 || 960
|-
| 31 || 248 || 992
|-
| 32 || 512 || 2048
|-
| 33 || 528 || 2112
|-
| 34 || 544 || 2176
|-
| 35 || 560 || 2240
|-
| 36 || 576 || 2304
|-
| 37 || 592 || 2368
|-
| 38 || 608 || 2432
|-
| 39 || 624 || 2496
|-
| 40 || 1280 || 5120
|-
| 41 || 1312 || 5248
|-
| 42 || 1344 || 5376
|-
| 43 || 1376 || 5504
|-
| 44 || 1408 || 5632
|-
| 45 || 1440 || 5760
|-
| 46 || 1472 || 5888
|-
| 47 || 1504 || 6016
|-
| 48 || 3072 || 12288
|-
| 49 || 3136 || 12544
|-
| 50 || 3200 || 12800
|-
| 51 || 3264 || 13056
|-
| 52 || 3328 || 13312
|-
| 53 || 3392 || 13568
|-
| 54 || 3456 || 13824
|-
| 55 || 3520 || 14080
|-
| 56 || 7168 || 28672
|-
| 57 || 7296 || 29184
|-
| 58 || 7424 || 29696
|-
| 59 || 7552 || 30208
|-
| 60 || 7680 || 30720
|-
| 61 || 7808 || 31232
|-
| 62 || 7936 || 31744
|-
| 63 || 8064 || 32256
|-
| 64 || 16384 || 65536
|-
| 65 || 16640 || 66560
|-
| 66 || 16896 || 67584
|-
| 67 || 17152 || 68608
|-
| 68 || 17408 || 69632
|-
| 69 || 17664 || 70656
|-
| 70 || 17920 || 71680
|-
| 71 || 18176 || 72704
|- class="noalt"
|}

Charts - Revision history

Foxwarrior: 3 revisions imported

Foxwarrior: Redirected page to Decent approximations and other time savers#Charts

Foxwarrior: It's not quite as smooth a pattern, but at least you don't need to actually consult a chart to resolve it :)